6.3 KiB
title
| title |
|---|
| Matroid Rainbow Base Cover |
This problem is proposed in [@emlektabla16_2024].
Let M=(E,\mathcal B) be a rank-r matroid whose ground set decomposes into two disjoint bases. Furthermore,
assume that E is colored by r colors, each color appearing exactly twice. A basis of M is called rainbow if
it does not contain two elements of the same color.
::: {.Problem #prob-rainbowbasecover}
What is the minimum number of rainbow bases needed to cover E?
:::
Kristóf Bérczi conjectured the minimum number is 3.
Currently known bounds:
- upperbound:
\floor{\log_2 |E|}+1by matroid intersection; - lowerbound:
3on graphic matroid ofK_4.
::: {.Conjecture #conj-doublecover}
Let M_1 and M_2 be two matroid on the same ground set E. Assume that E decomposes into two bases in both of them.
Then M_1 and M_2 has four common bases (allow repetition) that cover each element exactly twice.
:::
Let M_1 be the partition matroid of colors and let M_2 be M.
If [@conj-doublecover] is true, then 3 common bases will be enough to cover E.
Known results
Let \beta(M) be the covering number of matroid M. Given two matroids M_1,M_2 on the same ground set, \beta(M_1\cap M_2) is the minimum number of common independent sets needed to cover the ground set.
[@conj-doublecover] is basically asking for \beta(M_1\cap M_2) when the ground set E is partitioned into 2 common bases of M_1 and M_2.
Results and conjectures on \beta(M_1\cap M_2)
One can see that \beta(M_1\cap M_2)\geq \min \set{\beta(M_1),\beta(M_2)}. Aharoni and Berger showed that \beta(M_1\cap M_2)\leq 2 \max \set{\beta(M_1),\beta(M_2)}
::: {.Conjecture title="Aharoni and Berger"}
Let M_1 and M_2 be two matroids on the same ground set.
- If
\beta(M_1)\neq \beta(M_2), then\beta(M_1\cap M_2)=\max \set{\beta(M_1),\beta(M_2)}. - If
\beta(M_1)= \beta(M_2), then\beta(M_1\cap M_2)\leq \max \set{\beta(M_1),\beta(M_2)}+1. :::
Cases that have been verified:
- If
\beta(M_1)=\beta(M_2)=2then\beta(M_1\cap M_2)=3.^[Note that this case does not give an answer to [@prob-rainbowbasecover] since the covering in\beta(M_1\cap M_2)uses common independent sets instead of common bases.] - If
\beta(M_1)=2,\beta(M_2)=3, then\beta(M_1\cap M_2)\leq 4. - If
\beta(M_1)=2,\beta(M_2)=k\geq 4, then\beta(M_1\cap M_2)\leq 2\ceil{k/2}+2.
::: {.Theorem title="Davies and McDiarmid"}
Let M_1 and M_2 be strongly base orderable matroids on the same ground set.
Then \beta(M_1\cap M_2)= \max \set{\beta(M_1),\beta(M_2)}.
:::
See [@berczi_partitioning_2024] for refs. Bérczi and Schwarcz generalized SBO using the following definition.
::: {.Definition title="strongly base reorderable"}
A matroid is called strongly base reorderable(SBRO) if for any pair A,B of bases, there exists bases A',B' and a bijection \phi:A'\setminus B'\to B'\setminus A' such that A'\cap B'=A\cap B,A'\cup B'=A\cup B, and (A'\setminus X)\cup \phi(X) is a basis for every X\subset A'\setminus B'.
:::
::: Lemma The class of SRBO matroids is complete(closed under taking minors, duals, direct sums, truncations and induction by directed graphs). :::
They also showed that SBRO is sufficient for \beta(M_1\cap M_2)=\max \set{\beta(M_1),\beta(M_2)}.
::: Theorem
Let M_1 and M_2 be strongly base reorderable matroids on the same ground set.
Then \beta(M_1\cap M_2)= \max \set{\beta(M_1),\beta(M_2)}.
:::
Circuit cover
Let M=(E,\mathcal B) be a matroid and let A,B\in \mathcal B be two bases of M.
Given a graph G=(A\Delta B, F), we say G covers a circuit C\subset A\Delta B if the induced subgraph G[C] contains an edge.
For a class of circuits \mathcal C in A\Delta B, we say G covers \mathcal C if G covers every circuit in \mathcal C.
::: {.Conjecture #conj-alterpath}
Let A,B be bases of a matroid M. Then there exists a path that alternates between A\setminus B and B\setminus A and covers \mathcal C[A\cup B].
:::
Bérczi and Schwarcz [@berczi_partitioning_2024] verified this conjecture for graphic matroids, paving matroids and spikes. They also showed an useful lemma:
::: {.Lemma title="informal" #lem-reduction} To verify [@conj-alterpath] for a minor closed class of matroids, one only need to consider matroids in this class whose ground set can be partitioned into two disjoint bases. :::
[@conj-alterpath] on cographic matroid
::: Lemma [@conj-alterpath] holds on cographic matroids. :::
::: Proof
By [@lem-reduction] it suffices to show the following: Let A,B be two spanning trees on vertex set V. One can find a sequence of edges in A and B such that
- no consecutive edges belong to
AorB, and that - every cut in
(V,A\cup B)contains some consecutive edge pair in the sequence.
We prove by induction on |V|.
- If
|V|=2, there is only one non-empty cut. - Suppose that the lemma holds for
|V|<k. LetG=(V,A\cup B)be the union of two spanning trees onkvertices. The average degree ofGis4-4/kand the degree of any vertex must be at least 2. Thus there is always a vertexvwith\deg(v)\in \set{2,3}.- If
\deg(v)=2, thenvmust be a leaf in both spanning trees, soG-vis the union of two spanning trees. Leta,bbe the edges incident tovinG. By induction hypothesis there is a desired edge sequence\mathcal Sfor the graphG-v. We appenda,b(orb,a, depending on which tree the last element of\mathcal Sbelongs to) to\mathcal S. Then the only cut that is not covered by\mathcal Sis\delta(v), which contains the paira,b. - If
\deg(v)=3, then assumevis a leaf inAand a deg-2 vertex inB. Leta,b_1,b_2be the edges incident tovand letx,ybe the neighbors ofvinB. We construct a new graphG'by deletingvfromGand adding a new edged=(x,y). ThenG'is the union of two spanning trees and there is a desired sequence\mathcal S'forG'. We construct a new sequence\mathcal Sby replacingdin\mathcal S'with 3 edgesb_1,a,b_2. ForX\subsetneq V\setminus \set{v}, the cut\delta(X)is always covered by\mathcal S'but possibly used. However, any cut separatingxandymust containb_1orb_2inG, which keeps\mathcal Sfeasible. The remaining case is\delta(v)which is covered byb_1,a,b_2. :::
- If